Request a Rep
Request a Rep

VALOR-HCM Secondary Endpoints

For SRT-eligible patients with NYHA class II-III obstructive HCM,

CAMZYOS® Demonstrated Significant Improvement Across All Secondary Endpoints vs Placebo in VALOR-HCM1,2

LVOT Obstruction

CAMZYOS Significantly Reduced LVOT Obstruction vs Placebo1

Mean change in post-exercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline to Week 161,2

Treatment difference (95% CI): -38 mmHg (-49, -28);
P<0.0001

Secondary Endpoint: Post-exercise LVOT Peak Gradient Chart Secondary Endpoint: Post-exercise LVOT Peak Gradient Chart

CI=confidence interval; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; NYHA=New York Heart Association; SD=standard deviation; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

Exploratory Endpoints: Mean Change in Resting and Valsalva LVOT Peak Gradient Measured Over the 16-Week Treatment Period2

While these exploratory endpoints were prespecified, they were not powered for significance.2

LVOT peak gradient difference at rest²
Treatment difference (95% CI): -33.4 mmHg (-42.3, -24.5)

Exploratory Endpoint: LVOT Gradient Chart Exploratory Endpoint: LVOT Gradient Chart

LVOT peak gradient difference with Valsalva2
Treatment difference (95% CI): -47.6 mmHg (-58.2, -37.0)

Exploratory Endpoint: LVOT  Gradient Chart With Valsalva Exploratory Endpoint: LVOT  Gradient Chart With Valsalva

NYHA Class

With CAMZYOS, Significantly More Patients Improved by ≥1 NYHA Class vs Placebo1

Proportion of patients with ≥1 NYHA class improvement from baseline to Week 161,2

Treatment difference (95% CI): 41% (25, 58);
P<0.0001

CI=confidence interval; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; NYHA=New York Heart Association; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

Exploratory endpoint: NYHA class changes from baseline to Week 16 in CAMZYOS and placebo2

Data below showing improvement of ≥2 classes was exploratory in nature and not powered for significance.

Change in NYHA class at Week 16.2

NYHA Class Changes Chart NYHA Class Changes Chart

Patient-Reported Outcomes

CAMZYOS Showed Significant Mean Improvement in KCCQ-23–CSS vs Placebo1

Mean change in KCCQ-23–CSS (Patient-Reported Total Symptom Score and Physical Limitations) from baseline to Week 161

Treatment difference (95% CI): 9 (5, 14);
P<0.0001

Secondary Endpoint: Least Squares Mean Change in KCCQ-23 Chart Secondary Endpoint: Least Squares Mean Change in KCCQ-23 Chart

The baseline mean (SD) KCCQ-23–CSS was 70 (16) for the CAMZYOS group (n=56) and 66 (20) for the placebo group (n=56).2

KCCQ-23–TSS: Mean (SD) change from baseline to Week 16 was 10 (16) for CAMZYOS and 2 (14) for placebo.1

KCCQ-23–PL Score: Mean (SD) change from baseline to Week 16 was 10 (19) for CAMZYOS and 2 (17) for placebo.1

The KCCQ-23–CSS is derived from the TSS and PL score of the KCCQ-23. The Clinical Summary Score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing less severe symptoms and/or physical limitations.1

KCCQ-23–CSS=Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (23-item version)–Clinical Summary Score; LS=least squares; PL=physical limitations; SD=standard deviation; SE=standard error; TSS=total symptom score.

Cardiac Biomarkers

CAMZYOS Reduced Cardiac Biomarkers vs Placebo1,2

The clinical significance of the NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin I findings is unknown

Change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Week 161,2

Geometric mean ratio difference (95% CI): 0.33 (0.26, 0.42)*
P<0.0001

Secondary Endpoint: Geometric Mean Change in NT proBNP Chart Secondary Endpoint: Geometric Mean Change in NT proBNP Chart

Change in cardiac troponin I from baseline to Week 161,2

Geometric mean ratio difference (95% CI): 0.53 (0.41, 0.70)*
P<0.0001

Secondary Endpoint: Geometric Mean Change in Cardiac Troponin 1 Chart Secondary Endpoint: Geometric Mean Change in Cardiac Troponin 1 Chart

*Geometric mean ratios <1.0 represent an x-fold decrease for CAMZYOS compared with placebo.2

CI=confidence interval; GM=geometric mean; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; NYHA=New York Heart Association; NT-proBNP=N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

The efficacy of CAMZYOS was evaluated in VALOR-HCM, a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 112 adult patients with severely symptomatic drug-refractory obstructive HCM, and NYHA Class III–IV or Class II with exertional syncope or near syncope. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting dose of 5 mg of CAMZYOS (n=56) or placebo (n=56) once daily for 16 weeks. Dosage was monitored and adjusted at Weeks 8 and 12 to optimize patient response (decrease in LVOT gradient with Valsalva) and maintain LVEF ≥50%.1,2

Select Important Safety Information

ADVERSE REACTIONS
Based on the safety profile from the pivotal EXPLORER-HCM trial, there were no new adverse reactions identified in VALOR-HCM. See EXPLORER-HCM safety.

This website is best viewed
using the horizontal display
on your tablet device.

This website is best viewed
using the vertical display
on your mobile device.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2023.
  2. Desai MY, Owens A, Geske JB, et al. Myosin inhibition in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy referred for septal reduction therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(2):95-108.
  3. Gersh BJ, Maron BJ, Bonow RO, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(25):e212-e260.
  4. Desai MY, Wolski K, Owens A, et al. Study design and rationale of VALOR-HCM: evaluation of mavacamten in adults with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy who are eligible for septal reduction therapy. Am Heart J. 2021;239:80-89.