CAMZYOS® Study Designs for EXPLORER-HCM and EXPLORER-LTE

On this page:         EXPLORER-HCM          EXPLORER-‍LTE

EXPLORER-HCM: Study Design

EXPLORER-HCM: A Groundbreaking Phase 3 Trial for Symptomatic NYHA Class II–III Obstructive HCM1,2

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS vs placebo1,2

EXPLORER-HCM clinical trial study design

92%

of patients were on background
therapy with BBs or CCBs2*

CAMZYOS (n=119/123) | Placebo (n=112/128)

*Patients on BBs or CCBs were allowed to continue background therapy.2

The primary composite functional endpoint and hierarchical secondary endpoints were designed to assess treatment parameters for symptomatic NYHA class II–III obstructive HCM2

Primary composite functional endpoint measured change from baseline to Week 30 in symptoms (NYHA) and functional capacity (pVO2)1,2

Hierarchical secondary endpoints1,2†:
(Measured from baseline to Week 30)

  • Change in post-exercise LVOT gradient
  • Change in pVO2
  • Proportion of patients with ≥1 NYHA class improvement
  • Change in KCCQ-23–CSS
  • Change in HCMSQ-SoB

Select prespecified exploratory endpoints1,2:
(Not powered for statistical significance)

  • Post-exercise LVOT peak gradient <50 mm Hg
  • Post-exercise LVOT peak gradient <30 mm Hg
  • Proportion of patients with reductions in serum concentrations of N⁠-⁠terminal pro B-‍type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI)
All assessments for secondary endpoints were performed and Type I error was controlled in hierarchical order (sequence as indicated above) upon achieving significance in the primary endpoint (with two tailed P<0.05 required to proceed).2

HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HCMSQ-SoB=Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire Shortness of Breath subscore; KCCQ-23–CSS=Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (23-item version)–Clinical Summary Score; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; NYHA=New York Heart Association; pVO2=peak oxygen consumption; SRT=septal reduction therapy.

Select baseline patient characteristics in EXPLORER-HCM1,2

Select baseline patient characteristics
Values in the table are mean ± SD, n (%) CAMZYOS (n=123) Placebo (n=128)
Age, mean (SD), years 59 (12.2) 59 (11.8)
Women, n (%) 57 (46) 45 (35)
Race, n (%)
White 115 (94) 114 (89)
Black or African American 1 (1) 5 (4)
American Indian or Alaska Native 0 1 (1)
Asian 4 (3) 2 (2)
Unknown 3 (2) 6 (5)
Background HCM treatment, n (%)
Beta blocker
Calcium channel blocker
94 (76)
25 (20)
95 (74)
17 (13)
NYHA class, n (%)
Class II
Class III
88 (72)
35 (28)
95 (74)
33 (26)
pVO2 mean (SD), mL/kg/min 18.9 (4.9) 19.9 (4.9)
LVOT gradient at baseline, mean (SD), mmHg
Valsalva
Post-exercise§
72 (32)
86 (34)
74 (32)
84 (36)
LVEF, mean (SD), (%) 74 (6) 74 (6)
Critical cardiac history
Atrial fibrillation, n (%) 12 (10) 23 (18)
Implantable cardioverter-‌defibrillator, n (%) 27 (22) 29 (23)
Prior invasive SRT, n (%) 11 (9) 8 (6)
Nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.2
§ Data missing for one patient in the CAMZYOS group and one patient in the placebo group.2

SD=standard deviation.

Study procedures used in EXPLORER-HCM to determine the efficacy and safety of CAMZYOS

EXPLORER-LTE: Study Design

EXPLORER-LTE: A Cohort of MAVA-LTE, a 5-Year Extension Designed to Evaluate Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Clinically Guided Dosing for CAMZYOS3-6

To be eligible to enroll in the EXPLORER-LTE cohort of MAVA-LTE, patients had to complete EXPLORER-HCM, including the 8-‍week washout period. Of the 251 patients|| who completed EXPLORER-HCM, 231 enrolled in MAVA-LTE in the EXPLORER-LTE cohort, which is being evaluated in a single-‍arm trial without an active comparator.

LTE trial objectives assessed long-term effects of CAMZYOS4

  • Primary objective: Safety and tolerability

  • Secondary objectives: Changes in NYHA class, LVOT gradients at rest and with Valsalva, and LVEF 

  • Exploratory objectives: Changes in NT-proBNP and measures of left ventricle filling

EXPLORER-LTE 5-Year Study Design
|| Patients enrolled in EXPLORER-LTE were part of either the CAMZYOS or placebo arm in the EXPLORER-HCM trial.3-6
This is not consistent with the current approved dosing schedule per the U.S. Full Prescribing Information.1

EOT=end of treatment; QD=once daily.

MAVA-LTE: EXPLORER-LTE cohort study limitations and additional information:

  • These data are not included in the CAMZYOS U.S. Full Prescribing Information. Caution should be used in interpreting the data as data were not statistically tested for significance but are only descriptive in nature3

  • MAVA-LTE, including the EXPLORER-LTE cohort, is a single-arm study without active comparator; patients in EXPLORER-LTE were part of either the CAMZYOS or placebo group in EXPLORER-HCM; therefore, baseline characteristics for EXPLORER-LTE changed due to time and consolidation of both arms to one cohort4

  • There are limitations with the data, including decreased sample size and different continuation rates based on the continued involvement of responders and attrition of nonresponders4

  • The EXPLORER-LTE cohort of MAVA-LTE included 14 patients who were NYHA class I at screening. These patients were included in the EXPLORER-HCM trial; 5 had received CAMZYOS, and 9 were in the placebo group3

Select Patient Baseline# Characteristics for EXPLORER-LTE3

Characteristic EXPLORER-LTE 
cohort (n=123)
Age, mean (SD), years 60.0 (11.9)
Female, n (%) 91 (39.4)
Background HCM treatment, n (%)
  • BBs
  • CCBs

176 (76.2)
38 (16.5)
NYHA class, n (%)
  • Class I
  • Class II
  • Class III

14 (6.1)
152 (65.8)
65 (28.1)
NT-proBNP, median (IQR), ng/L 766.0 (323.0, 1593.0)
[n=230]
LVOT gradient at baseline, mean (SD), mmHg
  • Resting
  • Valsalva

48.3 (31.9)
69.5 (33.3) [n=228]
LVEF, mean (SD), % 74.0 (5.9) [n=230]
Time on study, median (range), weeks 166.1 (6.0–228.1)

#Baseline is defined as last non-missing measurement before the first dose of CAMZYOS in MAVA-LTE.3
IQR=interquartile range.

References:

  1. CAMZYOS [Package insert]. Princeton, NJ: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; 2025.
  2. Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Barriales-Villa R, et al; EXPLORER-HCM study investigators. Mavacamten for treatment of symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (EXPLORER-HCM): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10253):759-769. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31792-X
  3. Garcia-Pavia P, Oreziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024; ehae579. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae579
  4. Rader F, Oręziak A, Choudhury L, et al. Mavacamten treatment for symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: interim results from the MAVA-LTE study, EXPLORER-LTE Cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;12(1):164-177.
  5. Garcia-Pavia P, Oreziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term effect of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2024 [supplementary appendix]. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae579
  6. Garcia-Pavia P, Oreziak A, Masri A, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of mavacamten in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Up to 3.5-year follow-up results of the EXPLORER cohort of MAVA-Long-Term Extension study. Presented at European Society of Cardiology; August 30-September 2, 2024; London and online. Oral presentation 84470.


© 2025 MyoKardia, Inc., a Bristol Myers Squibb company. 
CAMZYOS® and the CAMZYOS and MyCAMZYOS Logos are trademarks of MyoKardia, Inc.

3500-US-2400621   04/25

This site is intended for U.S. Healthcare Professionals only.