Pivotal Trials Overview
For patients with NYHA class II–III obstructive HCM,
Comparisons between the 2 studies cannot be made.
EXPLORER-HCM
A 30-week, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with
NYHA class II–III obstructive HCM (N=251).1
At baseline, 92% of patients were on background
therapy (BB or CCB).2
VALOR-HCM
A 16-week, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with severely symptomatic obstructive HCM (N=112) who were eligible for SRT.1
At baseline, 95% of patients were on background therapy (BB, CCB, disopyramide, or combination therapy).3
Review full study design >Primary endpoints explained
EXPLORER-HCM: The primary composite functional endpoint was defined as achieved with an improvement of pVO2 by 1.5 mL/kg/min or more and improvement in NYHA class by at least 1 or an improvement of pVO2 by 3.0 mL/kg/min or more and no worsening in NYHA class.1,2
VALOR-HCM: The primary endpoint was a composite of patients who remained eligible for SRT (per 2011 AHA/ACC Guidelines) at week 16 or decided to proceed with SRT prior to or at week 16. Patients who discontinued treatment or whose response status could not be assessed at the end of the 16-week dosing period were classified as SRT eligible.1,3
2x as many patients taking CAMZYOS
achieved the primary composite functional endpoint (symptoms and exercise capacity) vs placebo; 37% with CAMZYOS (n=45/123) vs. 17% with placebo (n=22/128).
Difference (95% CI): 19% (9, 30); P=0.0005
See EXPLORER-HCM primary>3x as many patients were able to avoid SRT at 16 weeks
(no longer guideline-eligible for SRT at Week 16 and did not choose to undergo SRT by Week 16) with CAMZYOS vs placebo. 18% (n=10/56) of patients taking CAMZYOS met the primary composite endpoint vs 77% (n=43/56) taking placebo. Two patients in each group decided to proceed with SRT.
Difference (95% CI): 59% (44, 74); P<0.0001
See VALOR-HCM primary composite endpoint data >Both studies evaluated changes in LVOT obstruction
-47 mmHg mean reduction
of post-exercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline with CAMZYOS vs -10 mmHg with placebo.
Difference (95% CI): -35 mmHg (-43, -28); P<0.0001
See EXPLORER-HCM LVOT obstruction data >-39 mmHg mean reduction
of post-exercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline with CAMZYOS vs -2 mmHg with placebo.
Difference (95% CI): -38 mmHg (-49, -28); P<0.0001
See VALOR-HCM LVOT obstruction data >Both studies evaluated changes in NYHA class
65% of patients receiving CAMZYOS
(n=80/123) improved by ≥1 NYHA class from baseline vs 31% in the placebo group (n=40/128).
Difference (95% CI): 34% (22, 45); P<0.0001
See EXPLORER-HCM NYHA class data >63% of patients receiving CAMZYOS
(n=35/56) improved by ≥1 NYHA class from baseline vs 21% in the placebo group (n=12/56).
Difference (95% CI): 41% (25, 58); P<0.0001
See VALOR-HCM NYHA class data >Comparisons between the 2 studies
cannot be made.
EXPLORER-HCM
A 30-week, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with
NYHA class II–III obstructive HCM (N=251).1
At baseline, 92% of patients were on background
therapy (BB or CCB).2
Primary endpoints explained
EXPLORER-HCM: The primary composite functional endpoint was defined as
achieved with an improvement of pVO2 by 1.5 mL/kg/min or more and improvement in NYHA class by at least 1 or an improvement of pVO2 by 3.0 mL/kg/min or more and no worsening in NYHA class.1,2
VALOR-HCM: The primary endpoint was a composite of patients who remained eligible for SRT (per 2011 AHA/ACC Guidelines) at week 16 or decided to proceed with SRT prior to or at week 16. Patients who discontinued treatment or whose response status could not be assessed at the end of the 16-week dosing period were classified as SRT eligible.1,3
2x as many patients taking CAMZYOS
achieved the primary composite functional endpoint (symptoms and exercise capacity) vs placebo; 37% with CAMZYOS (n=45/123) vs. 17% with placebo (n=22/128).
Difference (95% CI): 19% (9, 30); P=0.0005
Both studies evaluated changes
in LVOT obstruction
-47 mmHg mean reduction
of post-exercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline with CAMZYOS vs -10 mmHg with placebo.
Difference (95% CI): -35 mmHg (-43, -28); P<0.0001
Both studies evaluated changes
in NYHA class
65% of patients receiving CAMZYOS
(n=80/123) improved by ≥1 NYHA class from baseline vs 31% in the placebo group (n=40/128).
Difference (95% CI): 34% (22, 45); P<0.0001
Comparisons between the 2 studies
cannot be made.
VALOR-HCM
A 16-week, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with severely symptomatic obstructive HCM (N=112) who were eligible for SRT.1
At baseline, 95% of patients were on background therapy (BB, CCB, disopyramide, or combination therapy).3
Primary endpoints explained
EXPLORER-HCM: The primary composite functional endpoint was defined as
achieved with an improvement of pVO2 by 1.5 mL/kg/min or more and improvement in NYHA class by at least 1 or an improvement of pVO2 by 3.0 mL/kg/min or more and no worsening in NYHA class.1,2
VALOR-HCM: The primary endpoint was a composite of patients who remained eligible for SRT (per 2011 AHA/ACC Guidelines) at week 16 or decided to proceed with SRT prior to or at week 16. Patients who discontinued treatment or whose response status could not be assessed at the end of the 16-week dosing period were classified as SRT eligible.1,3
>3x as many patients were able to avoid SRT at 16 weeks
(no longer guideline-eligible for SRT at Week 16 and did not choose to undergo SRT by Week 16) with CAMZYOS vs placebo. 18% (n=10/56) of patients taking CAMZYOS met the primary composite endpoint vs 77% (n=43/56) taking placebo. Two patients in each group decided to proceed with SRT.
Difference (95% CI): 59% (44, 74); P<0.0001
Both studies evaluated changes
in LVOT obstruction
-39 mmHg mean reduction
of post-exercise LVOT peak gradient from baseline with CAMZYOS vs -2 mmHg with placebo.
Difference (95% CI): -38 mmHg (-49, -28); P<0.0001
Both studies evaluated changes
in NYHA class
63% of patients receiving CAMZYOS
(n=35/56) improved by ≥1 NYHA class from baseline vs 21% in the placebo group (n=12/56).
Difference (95% CI): 41% (25, 58); P<0.0001
BB=beta blocker; CCB=calcium channel blocker; CI=confidence interval; HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; LVOT=left ventricular outflow tract; NYHA=New York Heart Association; SRT=septal reduction therapy.
This website is best viewed
using the horizontal display
on your tablet device.
This website is best viewed
using the vertical display
on your mobile device.
Reference: